Phoenix Criminal Defense Attorney | Scottsdale DUI Lawyer
Drunk Driving Lawyer Phoenix Criminal Lawyer and DUI Defense Ciminal Defense Law Firm Profile Case Results in Arizona Courts Frequently Asked Criminal Defense Questions Contact our Phoenix Attorneys now Drug Possession Attorney
Areas of Criminal Law Practiced
Categories


Subscribe
DUI
Aggravated DUI
Traffic Offenses
Drug Crimes
Domestic Violence
Sex Crimes
Kidnapping
Violent Offenses
Weapons Charges
Bench Warrants
Expungements
Post Conviction Issues
Probation Violation
Fraud
Forgery
White Collar
Internet/Computer Crimes
Theft Crimes
Juvenile Crimes
Property Offenses
Child Abuse
Criminal Damage
Trespassing

Recently in DUI Category

Blood Testing in DUI Cases

| No Comments | No TrackBacks

Blood testing is becoming more and more popular when it comes to DUI testing. Instead of using the breath testing instruments, most of the law enforcement agencies are now taking blood tests. The officers in the state of Arizona are drawing the blood of the drivers themselves instead of sending them to a medical facility for the test. Not a very long time back, Arizona was the only state where the officers were required to draw the blood of the people who they suspected to be driving under the influence of alcohol. Even though people are not sure whether all officers are carrying out this test, Arizona has still made a name for itself for being a leading state where its officers carrying out blood tests and it has also influenced other states to follow this act.  Many Phoenix criminal defense attorneys have handled cases involving blood samples collected directly by the police.

 

Some Phoenix area DUI officers have been trained as phlebotomists and are regularly taking blood samples from DUI suspects themselves. Mostly, the officers are trained to draw blood and they use needles to take out the blood samples from the suspects. The tubes that they use to store the blood in contain an anticoagulant and preservative so that the blood test can give an accurate result. By using the preservative, bacteria will not grow in the blood. If bacteria grow in the blood then it will lead to the neo-genesis of alcohol present in the blood. Anticoagulant is added in the tube so that the blood that is collected will not clot.

 

There is a reason why the law prefers blood testing and this is because of the fact that this test can not be challenged by defense attorneys. This is because blood tests are more reliable than breath testing. There is a drawback of this kind of testing and it is that the process is a complicated one, costs more and the results take longer to obtain.  Nevertheless, a skilled Scottsdale DUI defense attorney may still be able to successfully attack the reliability of a blood test in a DUI case.

Cut & Paste DUI Police Reports

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
http://www.duiblog.com/2004/10/30/xeroxed-dui-symptoms/

In several cases of DUI arrests it has been found that the police officer in charge had similar reports for all the arrest cases. Any Phoenix DUI attorney will tell you that many law enforcers are not so honest when they are making DUI reports. This is particularly evident in reports that show report similar symptoms in all DUI cases.

For example, portions of the reports seem common when discussing how the driver fumbled for his wallet, had bloodshot eyes and claimed he had consumed two beers before driving.

With the use of computer technology, it is all too easy for police officer to simply "cut and paste" boilerplate portions of their report from one case to the next.  Not surprisingly, the claims included in the "Xeroxed" reports seldom involves observations that could independently be confirmed or debunked - such as the odor of alcohol on the drivers breath.

In fact, I have personally seen DUI police reports wherein the officer was so lazy, he neglected to remove the name of a previous arrestee when transferring portions of that report into my client's report.  Many drivers charged with DUI in Scottsdale or Phoenix have the misconception that there is nothing that can be done to avoid a DUI conviction if their blood or breath test is over a .08%.  It is important to keep in mind that regardless of how high one's BAC might be, there are always potential defenses that can be asserted which arise from the reasonableness of the officer's conduct when initiating the traffic stop and placing you under arrest.  Because these types of issues all to often hinge on the credibility of the officers in-court testimony, it is important to explore any aspects of the case which demonstrate that the reports were not completed accurately or completely.  Identifying "Xeroxed" symptoms can be a very helpful step in that process.

Statewide DUI taskforce nets 780 arrests so far

| No Comments | No TrackBacks

According to local newspaper reports, a statewide DUI task force began on August 21st and is scheduled to continued until after the Labor day weekend.  The task force has reportedly made over 750 arrests so far and the average BAC of the drivers arrested was .15% which, incidentally, is the minimum blood alcohol concentration for which charges of extreme DUI can be filed in Phoenix.

 

Over 70 of those arrested were charged with underage DUI.

 

Please be safe this holiday weekend.  If you are charged with a DUI or other criminal offense, please contact a Phoenix Criminal Defense Attorney at the Law Offices of Joshua S. Davidson.

Drive thru windows not to be used to catch DUI drivers

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
According to news reports, Pima County Sheriffs office once considered plans to place undercover police officers in the drive-thru windows of various fast foot establishments.  The undercover officers reportedly would screen customers as they drove up to the window for symptoms commonly associated with DUI such as bloodshot eyes and slurred speech.  If a driver suspected of DUI or another crime passed by, the uniformed officer waiting on standby would be dispatched.

The program was named Operation WULF - would you like fries.  Very clever.

If you are facing a DUI or any other criminal offense, contact Phoenix Criminal Attorney Joshua S. Davidson today.

An interlock device will become mandatory if you are convicted of a DUI in Phoenix, Scottsdale or any city in Arizona.

Currently the state of Arizona requires no less than 12 months use of the interlock device in the case of a first or second offense standard DUI. This length of time also applies to the first and second offense of an extreme DUI conviction. In the case of the first offense of a super extreme DUI a lengthier sentence is required. This requirement is to be no less than eighteen months. If a second offense of this sort happens then the offender will be required to make use of the interlock device for no less than 24 months.

There can be special circumstances that require a different sort of sentencing by the courts. In the case of an aggravated DUI (which is one that involves a minor) it is possible for the defendant to find leniency with the court if an interlock device is used on a voluntary basis. This can help to reduce the revocation of a license from a three year period down to getting special permission after the first ninety days of the suspension have been served. This can also hold true in the case of an implied consent violation as long as no others have been committed within the previous seven year period.

An ignition interlock device is a mechanical means of keeping a possible repeat offender from being able to commit the same offense. It does this by measuring the current BAC of the driver before the vehicle can be started. If the BAC is over the allowed limit then the vehicle will be rendered immobile. The vehicle then cannot be started until the device receives a sample that is completely alcohol free. It can then require the driver to provide samples at any time while it is still in operation. While it is possible that the interlock device may be bypassed in some cases it is definitely not advisable.

Most all interlock devices are able to record any attempt that is made to bypass them. The company that monitors and controls the interlock devices will then report the attempts to the Department of Motor Vehicles. This may end poorly for the convicted individual. It may end in the requirement of more time that the interlock device must be used or even complete revocation of the individual's license for the full period originally handed down by the court. The most important thing for a DUI offender to remember is that by knowing the Arizona DUI laws he or she will be able to better ensure that a further offense is not committed.  If you have any questions, be sure to ask your DUI attorney.

If you are facing DUI charges or have questions about an existing ignition interlock device requirement, please contact Scottsdale DUI Attorney Joshua S. Davidson today.

Roadside Field Sobriety Testing

| No Comments | No TrackBacks

Field sobriety tests are performed by law enforcement agencies throughout Scottsdale, Phoenix and Tempe as a means of developing probable cause for a DUI arrest. They are meant to test the individual's ability to handle their automobile in both a physical and psychological manner. While these tests are used by many different law enforcement agencies they are not considered 100% accurate. Almost all DUI attorneys agree that these tests should be refused.

Some of the tests with which the public may be acquainted include the alphabet test, balance test, counting test, finger-to-nose test and the portable breath test (or PBT). One thing to keep in mind is that while these tests are commonly used, many of them are still considered to be non-validated. The alphabet test involves having the suspect recite the alphabet both forward and backward. While easy to do in the correct order, when the alphabet is recited backward it becomes much more difficult.

One thing that must be kept in mind is that if the officer suggests the PBT you should politely refuse. These tests are unreliable and are not a scientifically accepted means of determining the BAC of a suspect. No matter what may be suggested, this test is voluntary and should be treated as such.

One of these tests is the Walk-and-Turn. This test involves having the suspect walk a straight line first one direction then another while keeping the feet heel to toe. Many officers will require no more than nine steps in either direction. Some may even require the arms to be held straight out to the sides. This allows them to look for a loss of balance or inability to follow verbal commands such as not touching the heel to the toe, stepping off the line, or even stopping abruptly during the maneuver.

Another means of determining loss of balance is by having the suspect stand on one leg. This will allow them to look for swaying drastically, having to use the arms for balance and having to hop to keep balance. The last standardized test is the Nystagmus test. This is performed by holding a small object in front of the suspect's face and moving it up and down or side to side. This can be a giveaway for those who have been drinking as alcohol impairs the body's ability to control the eyes and rapid jerking may occur.

While these tests are all used by the many different branches of law enforcement, one thing must be kept in mind. They are completely voluntary and are mainly a means of justifying a person's subsequent arrest and booking so that other means of testing may be administered. Keep in mind that you have the option to refuse these tests. Make sure that if you do so that it is in a courteous manner. There are many different people who cannot pass these tests for physical or mental reasons. It is important that the right to refuse such objective tests be retained by all citizens.

 

If you have been charged with a DUI in Scottsdale, Phoenix, Mesa, Tempe or anywhere in Maricopa County, contact Phoenix DUI Lawyer Joshua S. Davidson today to schedule a free initial consultation.